- - Why a dart frog poison believed to have killed Alexei Navalny points to the Kremlin

Freddie ClaytonFebruary 15, 2026 at 7:32 AM

1

A portrait of the late Alexei Navalny and floral tributes on March 1, 2024. (Vano Shlamov / AFP - Getty Images file) (Vano Shlamov)

The modern poison has become less a medieval cliché than a geopolitical signature flourish. Precise, deniable, and in Russia’s case, grimly familiar.

Accusations of Russian poisoning surfaced again this week after Western governments said laboratory analysis found the rare frog-derived toxin epibatidine, a compound associated with Ecuadorian poison dart frogs, in samples from the body of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny.

The allegation feeds into a long and deeply contested narrative around high-profile poison cases in Vladimir Putin’s Russia, from radioactive tea to nerve agents. Moscow has consistently denied involvement in the episodes, which have shaped its global reputation.

A joint statement by the U.K., France, Germany, Sweden and the Netherlands on Saturday said forensic tests concluded that epibatidine, a powerful neurotoxin, was present in Navalny’s system after his death in a Siberian penal colony in 2024.

Russia’s prison service reported in February 2024 that Navalny, 47, died after having felt unwell following a walk around the high-security facility in a remote town above the Arctic Circle where he was serving a combined 30½-year jail sentence.

British officials said only the Russian government had the capability and opportunity to deploy the toxin against Navalny, and have reported the case to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot said that the episode shows Vladimir Putin is willing to use chemical agents against his own citizens to maintain power.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said Saturday that Russia would comment “where there are test results, where there are formulas of the substances.”

While Russia dismisses the allegations, the case has focused attention on the extraordinary lethality of the substance involved, an exotic toxin whose potency and synthetic accessibility make it a weapon that experts say can be produced and deployed only by a state with advanced chemical capabilities.

Epipedobates anthonyi, known as Anthony’s poison arrow frog, typically measures 22 mm long. Its skin carries sufficient epibatidine to kill a human several times over, with lethal doses measured in minuscule amounts as little as 1.4 micrograms.

The drug “is not naturally found in Russia,” the British foreign ministry said in a joint statement Saturday, but its absence in nature is irrelevant when a state with advanced chemical capabilities can reproduce and deploy it.

“The structure is known and it’s possible to synthesize it chemically, so you wouldn’t have to go to Ecuador looking for brightly colored frogs, wash them down and get the toxin off their skin,” Alastair Hay, a professor of environmental toxicology at the University of Leeds, told NBC News.

“You could make it in the lab,” he said.

Epipedobates anthonyi, also known as Anthony's poison arrow frog. (Ondrej Prosicky / Getty Images) (Ondrej Prosicky)

The combination of synthetic accessibility and extreme potency may help explain why such toxins could be chosen as a weapon. According to Hay, the amount needed to be lethal is vanishingly small, making it deadly even in tiny doses.

“Once somebody starts developing symptoms, it would probably be much too late to do anything,” he added.

International law bans the use of chemical agents to harm people, whether or not a particular substance is specifically listed. Under the Chemical Weapons Convention, nerve agents like Novichoks are tightly controlled, and any deliberate use against humans is prohibited.

But Russians have a documented history of using toxic agents in targeted attacks.

In 2006, defector and former Russian spy Alexander Litvinenko died three weeks after drinking green tea laced with polonium-210 at a plush London hotel. The 2018 Salisbury attack in the U.K. saw the nerve agent Novichok used against former double agent Sergei Skripal and his daughter, leaving both critically ill and sparking international condemnation. A British woman, Dawn Sturgess, later died after being accidentally exposed to the nerve agent.

Navalny himself had previously survived an attack with a military nerve agent while on a business trip in Russia in 2020 — an attempt on his life that he blamed directly on Putin.

While such toxins can be made in a lab, Hay has no doubt that the manufacture would be state-led, “because these chemicals are so potent in such small concentrations.”

“The laboratory facilities have to be really state of the art,” he said, emphasizing the need for highly secure, specialized facilities to handle them safely.

Hay noted that Russia may have counted on the toxin in Navalny’s bloodstream and nervous system escaping detection because the concentration “would be so tiny.”

But he stressed that Western laboratories are equally sophisticated: “The facilities in the defense laboratories are eye-wateringly good,” he added, making stealth much harder than the perpetrators might have hoped.

Original Article on Source

Source: “AOL Breaking”